data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58ad1/58ad164074b82a221761e9c6ecaf53d66479c4ca" alt=""
Again, Keytruda and PARP fail to lynk
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58ad1/58ad164074b82a221761e9c6ecaf53d66479c4ca" alt=""
More evidence, as if it were needed, that PARP inhibition adds no benefit to Keytruda in lung cancer came today with the failure of Merck & Co’s Keylynk-006 study. This concerned Keytruda plus Lynparza in first-line non-squamous NSCLC, and came three months after the failure of Keylynk-008, a broadly similar trial in front-line squamous NSCLC. Launching such phase 3 studies always seemed surprising given the lack of scientific support; indeed, the phase 2 PIN trial testing Lynparza versus placebo in NSCLC maintenance yielded no statistically significant increase in PFS, while the phase 2 ORION study, testing AstraZeneca’s Imfinzi plus Lynparza as first-line NSCLC maintenance, also disappointed on PFS. A separate Keytruda/Lynparza combo study in prostate cancer, Keylynk-010, was stopped for futility two years ago. Still to read out in lung cancer are Keylynk-012 and 013, and given the precedent hopes here can’t be high. A postmortem of Keylynk-008 is due to be presented at a minisymposium during next month’s AACR conference.
Keytruda/Lynparza combo trials in lung cancer
Study | Setting | Design | Primary endpoints/outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Keylynk-008 | 1L squamous NSCLC | Keytruda + chemo, then Keytruda + Lynparza maintenance | Failed on OS vs Keytruda + chemo |
Keylynk-006 | 1L non-squamous NSCLC | Keytruda + chemo, then Keytruda + Lynparza maintenance | Failed on PFS & OS vs maintenance chemo |
Keylynk-012 | Stage III NSCLC | Keytruda + chemoradioation, then Keytruda +/- Lynparza | PFS & OS vs chemoradiation + Imfinzi, ends 2026 |
Keylynk-013 | 1L SCLC | Keytruda + chemoradioation, then Keytruda +/- Lynparza | PFS & OS vs chemoradiation, ends 2027 |
Source: OncologyPipeline.
1308